The Exchange Rate Analysis of Fish Cultivators (A Case Study in Bayongbong Garut Indonesia)
Asian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Research,
Page 36-48
DOI:
10.9734/ajfar/2021/v14i330299
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze 1) the exchange rate of fish cultivators (NTPI) in Garut Regency, and 2) the factors that affect the NTPI in Garut Regency. A case study method including both primary and secondary data was used in the study. Primary data were generated from the interviews with respondents. Secondary data were obtained from the relevant agencies. This study used 45 respondents as research sample based on the purposive sampling. The data analysis used is NTPI and multiple linear regression. The results obtained in this research are the average NTPI in Bayongbong Subdistrict, which is 116%, explaining that fish cultivators' expenditures on household consumption and production cost are lower than their income. So it can be concluded that fish cultivators in Bayongbong Subdistrict are prosperous cultivators. Factors that can affect NTPI are age, education level, work experience, number of family members, income, and expenditure.
Keywords:
- Cultivation
- garut regency
- fish cultivators
- the exhange rate
How to Cite
References
Munandar A, Kusasi F, Akhirman. Feasibility Analysis of Sea Cucumber Cultivation (Financial Aspects And Non-Financial Aspects) And Profit Sharing System At Pt Innovare Mariculture Development In Benan Village, Katang Bidare District, Lingga Regency. Student Online Journal. 2020;1(2):372-381.
Center for Statistics and Information Ministry of Marine and Fisheries. Marine and Fisheries in Figures 2018. Jakarta (ID): Center for Statistics and Information, Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries. 2018;356.
Central Bureau of Statistics. Garut Regency in Figures 2020. Garut: BPS Garut Regency. 2020; 280.
Department of Fisheries and Livestock Garut Regency. Potential of Aquaculture Land in Garut Regency: Garut;2019.
Department of Fisheries and Livestock Garut Regency. Freshwater Fish Production in Garut Regency: Garut;2020.
Department of Public Works and Spatial Planning (PUPR) UPT Kec. Bayongbong. Annual Rainfall in Kec. Bayongbong: Garut;2021.
Department of Fisheries and Livestock Garut Regency. Number of Fisheries Households in Garut Regency: Garut;2020.
Department of Fisheries and Livestock Garut Regency. Fish Cultivator in Kec. Bayongbong: Garut;2020.
Department of Fisheries and Livestock Garut Regency. Production of Fish Types in Kec. Bayongbong: Garut;2020.
Department of Fisheries and Livestock Garut Regency. Fish Consumption Rate (AKI) in Garut Regency: Garut;2020.
Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 2017. Fish Cultivation. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2004 Number 118: Jakarta;2017.
Rizal, Ahmad. Disparity in Coastal Area Development (Case Study of Tasikmalaya Regency). Journal of Aquatics. 2013;4(2):115-130.
Department of Fisheries and Livestock Garut Regency. Types of Business Actors in the Fisheries Sector in Garut Regency: Garut; 2020.
Directorate General of Aquaculture. Statistics on Export of Fishery Products. Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Affairs: Jakarta; 2015;1278.
Sugiyono. Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung : Alfabeta, CV;2017.
Sugiyono. Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung : Alfabeta, CV;2013.
Manyamsari, I. and Mujiburrahmad. Characteristics of farmers and their relationship with narrow land competence (Case: Sinar Sari Village, Dramaga District, Bogor Regency, West Java). Agripep. 2014;3(2):48-74.
Gumilar, I. Coastal Community Participation in Mangrove Forest Ecosystem Conservation (Case Study in Indramayu Regency, West Java). Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2018;20(2):145 – 153.
Syamsuddin AR, Vismaia D. Research Methods Language Education. Bandung: PT. Rosdakarya Youth; 2011.
Sugiyono. Educational Research Methods Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Approaches. Bandung: Alphabeta; 2014;516.
Central Bureau of Statistics. Indonesia Population Project 2010-2035. Jakarta. 2013;468.
Hermawan A, Amanah S, Fatchiya A. Participation of Fish Cultivators in Aquaculture Business Groups in Tasikmalaya Regency, West Java. Extension Journal. 2017;13(1):160-176.
Setyawati, Suwarno, Pertamawati LH, Sukardi Y, Fadillah R, Muflikhati I, TNP Utomo, Hariwisudo S, Hermawan T, Santoso H, Ramadhan A, Ermayati L. Analysis of Fisherman's Exchange Rate Achievement (NTN). Deputy for Natural Resources and Environment. Directorate of Marine Affairs and Fisheries of Bappenas: Jakarta. 2014;190.
Gumilar, I. Community Willingness To Pay for Coral Reef Resources in the Biawak Island Marine Conservation Area. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2019;21(3):342–348.
Ukkas, Imran. Factors Affecting Labor Productivity of Small Industry in Palopo City. Journal of Islamic Education Management. 2017;2(2):187 – 198.
Wulur, Timmy JFN. Pangemanan, Tambani GO. The Socio-Economic Condition of the Carp (Cyprinus carpio) Cultivating Community in Tatelu Village, Dimembe District, North Minahasa Regency. Journal of Acculturation. 2019;7(1):1161-1168.
Marwan RI, Anna Z, Gumilar I. Analysis of Household Exchange Rates for Fish Cultivators in Cilamaya Wetan, Karawang Regency. Thesis. Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Padjadjaran University: Jatinangor; 2010;71.
Ustriyana ING. Model and Measurement of Fishermen's Exchange Rate (Case of Karangasem Regency). Udayana University: Bali. 2005;8.
Sutra IA, Budiyanto, Riani I. Factors Affecting Consumption Exchange Rates of Vaname Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) Cultivators in Tinanggea District, South Konawe Regency. Journal of Fisheries Socioeconomics. 2018;3(2):115-126.
Julisa S. The Effect of Capital, Pond Size and Experience on the Income of Freshwater Fish Farmers in Nagari Taruang – Taruang, Rao District, Pasaman Regency. Journal of the College of Teacher Training and Education (STKIP). 2016;2(2):1-8.
Rizal, Achmad., Rosidah., and G. Fathira. Portrait of Fish Cultivator Household Welfare Level in Ciganjur, South Jakarta. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2018;20(1):39–44.
-
Abstract View: 367 times
PDF Download: 144 times